Mbeki, a racist on crime

  • This column was first published in South African business magazine Maverick, on 19 April 2007. Click here to subscribe to it the way it was meant to be read.

Thabo Mbeki is quite right about the white right. But he’s wrong about people who complain about crime. Mbeki’s latest theorising reveals his own racist prejudices, and deeply offends victims of crime.

I wasn’t going to write about it, but Thabo Mbeki changed my mind.

Unlike David Bullard or Jeff Koinange, I enjoy the (dubious) luxury of relative obscurity. So two months ago, when armed intruders held a knife to my throat, tied me up, and cleaned me out, I could choose whether to keep it private or go public.

For one, the trauma of such an event is an intensely private affair, and I preferred to keep it that way. It’s not the first time. Not that long ago, after a burglary on the day we moved into a house my then-partner and I were hoping to buy, I spent four months on nightwatch with a crowbar and torch. I chased off armed intruders eight times. The financial, legal and emotional scars remain, so I think I know something about crime-related stress and insecurity. I didn’t think going public would make it any easier this time.

Professionally, I had to consider the “write what you know” theory of journalism. Unlike most readers, I can write about it, and some would argue I have a moral duty to do so. A contrary theory holds that I’m too close to the story, the experience is subjective, and therefore I can’t be unbiased. I anyway don’t like writing about myself. I’m a sample of one, which is not representative. My life and times and petty complaints are little different from yours. I didn’t want to join the “poor me” or “phear my righteous rage” chorus that permeates so much of what passes for journalism nowadays.

This all changed when I read in the Sunday Times that Thabo Mbeki blames entrenched racism for the perception of crime: “The fact of the matter is that we still have a significant proportion of people among the white minority … that continues to live in fear of the black and especially African majority.”

This made me angry. As it turned out, the Sunday Times changed the tone and meaning of Mbeki’s words by selective quotation. For example, it used an innoccuous ellipsis to omit a crucial caveat: “but by no means everybody who is white”. So contrary to the impression left by the report, Mbeki wasn’t calling everyone who complained about crime a racist.

But his diversionary attack on the white right was no less reason to be upset.

Mbeki came across as callous to the distress of victims of crime – me, my domestic worker, the black guy living next to me who promptly ceased paying his rent and is fleeing the suburb, the domestic worker next door who had to receive trauma counselling after a similar event.

I was lucky: I had the nicest armed robbers you could hope to meet. I wasn’t hurt, they didn’t take my bicycle, and they did relieve me of an embarrassing stash of organic cotton t-shirts. What’s bankruptcy and mortal fear when I still have my bicycle?

Yet in the two months since I was robbed, and despite no effort whatever to keep track, I learned of eight other journalists who joined the ranks of crime victims. David Bullard, Jeff Koinange, Jedi Ramalaapa, Adel van Niekerk, Mahlatse Gallens, Candice Klein, Celeste Tema, and Jon Tullett. What am I to make of this? That there’s a plot to target journalists, because the crime problem is just being exaggerated by right-wing racists?

Mbeki’s divisive rhetoric is disingenuous. He blames white racists, when in fact it is Mbeki himself who casts crime as a racial issue, perpetrated by blacks upon whites. No, Mr Mbeki, I was tied up with a knife at my throat, but so was the black woman I employ. Her purse, cellphone, watch and money are also gone. A white friend of mine was badly beaten up by hijackers, but his black neighbour lost a son, brutally stabbed to death for a cellphone and R5.

Crime is happening to everyone, black and white. Even provincial ministers of safety and security aren’t safe. Of course there are still racists among whites. Of course the white right will use crime as a political issue. That’s what opposition parties do.

Yet Mbeki, who should know better, falls for this. He hammers home the racial wedge held up by white racists. Very few people pay attention to the right wing. Very many people pay attention to the president. So his recognition gives credibility and prominence to what most whites would consider a lunatic fringe.

Worse, that the president insists on viewing a practical security issue as one of race reveals more about his own views than about the white racists. His view perpetuates the racist stereotype that blacks, unjustly impoverished by oppression, commit crime out of need, and target their erstwhile overlords, rich whites, who in turn whine about it merely because they’re afraid of black rule.

This is offensive to blacks, most of whom are decent, law-abiding citizens who don’t feel poverty is an excuse for crime, and are just as likely to be victims of crime as whites. It’s offensive to poor people, because while the criminals drive flash cars and spend unearned loot, the majority are living proof that poor people aren’t criminals. It’s offensive to whites, many of whom are by no means rich, and don’t deserve to be assaulted, robbed or killed either way. For that matter, few whites under 35 or 40 had anything to do with white rule, so are justifiably offended when they’re tarred with the same brush as a few throwbacks of the past.

But the anger is mostly personal. What happened to me wasn’t propaganda, Mr Mbeki. It wasn’t perception. It wasn’t right-wing exaggeration. It wasn’t some dialectical inevitability of racial oppression.

It was very real. It was personally distressing and financially ruinous. Two months later, I still don’t sleep at night. Whenever the cat jogs the window handle on its way in or the dogs bark at the newspaper delivery van, I still find myself prowling the darkened house on bare feet, pathetically wielding a decorative hardwood bat. Then I feel like a stupid git and go back to bed. Then I’m angry at myself for feeling like a stupid git and not being able to sleep. Then I’m angry the bastards stole my fearsome old crowbar and torch. I’m angry at the people who casually violated the sanctity and security of my home. I’m angry that I respond in ways that make me feel like a stupid git. I’m angry at the people who condescend and call me racist when I fortify my home.

And when I hear someone – the president himself, to boot – claim that the problem is a few white racists who exaggerate crime for their own political ends, I get positively livid.

It’s time to stop with the pop-sociology and the political rhetoric, Mr Mbeki. It only highlights government’s failure to stem the tide of crime, and strengthens the propaganda of the racists you claim to oppose. No amount of rambling will unite and heal the country when transparent racism in our own president’s rhetoric does more to divide us than any white racist could ever hope to do.

Like it? Please spike it: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • muti
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • Fark
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • TailRank
  • SphereIt
Similar spikes:

11 comments so far

  1. Jonathan July 12, 2007 21:41

    Superb article Ivo. Bravo.

  2. johnhancock July 15, 2007 22:10

    Well said. A shame European and North American media don’t pick up this and other articles about black on white violence/racism in South Africa. The US is on its way to being like SA in white population.

  3. Ivo Vegter July 15, 2007 22:59

    Thing is, I don’t see it as black on white. I consider crime to be independent of race. You put a knife to my throat, I don’t really care much what colour you are, or what race I am. President Thabo Mbeki, however, seems to consider complaints about crime as racist whines by white people. Not only is that not true, but it’s a racist view in itself. It assumes the generalisation that white people are victims, and that black people commit crime. Whether or not that is true (which it isn’t), pointing it out certainly isn’t helpful. It doesn’t promote racial reconciliation. Which is why I don’t expect the president, of all people, to point it out.

  4. Tim Singiswa September 24, 2007 11:54

    These pale and bald skunks did not complain so much in the past about the inequalities,inhumanities and injustices of that equally pale and bald regimen as they do now and that alone show that they have a block on their shoulders when it comes to this government.

    Mbeki was spot-on and that is why he needs to be harsh with whites by infiltrating his i9ntelligence in all their affairs since they are too indepent right now where even their secret societies continue to operate as advancers of white power bases and comforts.

    of course whites are responsible fo the high levels of crime since they atre beneffitting tremendously from it with their security guard companies and websites by going to blacks and encourage them to commit crime.

  5. Ivo Vegter September 24, 2007 14:33

    You’ll forgive me if I don’t dignify your callous, offensive, ignorant and racist rant with a response, won’t you? You’re too kind.

  6. Coward! « Chessalee April 5, 2008 18:25

    […] time for ‘African solutions’ is over. And …the next article can be read in fully HERE …from a journalist in South Africa… worth reading! This made me angry. As it turned out, […]

  7. ayanda mkhize May 7, 2008 14:14

    i do agree with ivo vegter strongly, it doesnt really matter what colour ur skin is,crime is crime.i cannot even count for you just how many people i know, blakc people, who have been victims of crime.its colour blind.but do think about the context our country is coming from, oppressed black majority, wealthy white minority…and even tho we are past apartheid,there are still so many ways black people are being excluded from opportunities.

    educated black people who cant find employment, white people getting paid significantly more than thier black counter parts.and im speaking from experience here,as well as those of others. its tough being black in this country.and although i am not racist,i cant help but resent the white people who are still reeping the benefits of my fore fathers’ oppression.but its no excuse to do crime…but it is one for nepotism though!

  8. tIM sINGISWA May 8, 2008 9:43

    JUST BEFORE HE RETIRE MANDELA MET WITH RIGHTWING FARMERS TO GET THEIR EVIDENCE THAT MK AND APLA WERE BEHIND THE SPATE OF CRIMES AGAINST THEM AND THEY FAILED TO PRODUCE THE EVIDENCE AND MANDELA PRESENTED TO THEM INTELLIGENCE GATHERED INFORMATION THAT THEY WERE COMMITTING CRIME AGAINST EACH OTHER TO SABOTAGE HIS GOVERNMENT AND DIMINISH ITS IMAGE AND CREDIBILITY AND THE FOLLOW-UP WEBSITES LIKE THE MSN GROUP PURPORTING TO BE HIGHLIGHTING OUR CRIME LEVELS IS NOTHING BUT A RIGHTWING CAMPAIGN TO TARNISH THE IMAGE OF THIS GOVERNMENT SINCE IT AND WHITES DO NOT TALK ABOUT CRIME THATY HAPPEN TO BLACKS WHO ARE SUFFERING CRIMINALS WORSE THAN WHITES BUT AQGAINST WHITES.

    THIS JANI ALLAN FOR AN EXAMPLE IS A CONFIRMED RIGHTWINGER AND SHE IS JUST MBEKI`S TYPICAL EXAMPLE THAT ROIGHTWINGERS COMMIT THESE CRIME TO MAKE A MILIEU OUT OF IT ABROAD.

  9. tIM sINGISWA May 8, 2008 11:02

    You’ll forgive me if I don’t dignify your callous, offensive, ignorant and racist rant with a response, won’t you? You’re too kind.
    Coward! « Chessalee

    April 5, 2008

    18:25

    tHE TRUTH IS THE TRUTH IVO AND YOU HAVE TO LIVE WITH IT AQND ITS PAIN.

    THE VIOLENCE YOU RELATE IN THE ARTICLE WE HAVE LIVED WITH IT ALL OUR LIVES BUT BECAUSE IT WAS NOT RECORDED LIKE CRIMES AGAINST WHITES IT WENT QUIETLY.

    WHAT ROLE DID YOU PLAY IN THE PAST TO BRING ABOUT EQUALITY,HUMANITY,JUSTICE…AND WHAT ROLE ARE YOU PLAYING NOW TO RECONCILE AND HEAL…BOKOROL EXCEPT TO WHINGE!

  10. Ivo Vegter May 8, 2008 19:50

    You’re forgiven, tIM sINGISWA. I could suggest you ask your mommy to read the article to you again, and to make you pay attention this time. But it seems unsporting to hold the illiterate ravings of a drooling, emotionally disturbed imbecile against him. Even if he thinks it’s okay to go around pissing on other people’s doorsteps.

  11. The Trutherizer September 1, 2009 2:43

    A good person does good things. A bad person does bad things.

    Choose. That’s what I say.

    I’m sorry to hear about your pain man. And that of your neighbors and everybody mentioned in your bit. There’s too much of that here in sunny SA.

    Even the criminals are victims. They victimize themselves as much as they do the rest of us. Just in a different way… It’s sad that they cannot see it. It’s the tragedy of our time.

Leave a comment

Please be polite and on topic. Your e-mail is needed to help verify you are not a spam-bot, and rarely if I need to contact you privately. It will never be published, abused or disclosed to anyone.

Please be aware that first-time commenters, as determined by your name and e-mail, are moderated. This unconscionable attack on your freedom of speech is regrettable, but since it helps combat the spam flood, it is non-negotiable. Please do not submit your comment twice. It will appear as soon as I see it in the moderation queue.