Global warming bugs, update

I’ve made several updates to my original post on the errors in NASA’s GISS database for US temperatures. After half a dozen, another major inline update seemed immoderate.

Since Steve McIntyre’s site, Climate Audit, remains down, he borrowed Anthony Watts’ blog to explain in considerable detail why the error isn’t trivial, and to forward a response to a letter by GISS warmer-in-chief James Hansen (link in PDF).

Hansen’s letter appears defensive, argumentative and not a little arrogant:

No need to read further unless you are interested in temperature changes to a tenth of a degree over the U.S. and a thousandth of a degree over the world. <…>

My apologies if the quick response that I sent to Andy Revkin and several other journalists, including the suggestion that it was a tempest inside somebody’s teapot dome, and that perhaps a light was not on upstairs, was immoderate. It was not ad hominem, though.

From McIntyre’s reply to the letter:

Hansen may have been for 1934 before he was against it. But now that he’s for 1934 once again, he can’t say that he was for it all along.

Hat tip: Kriek Jooste.

Like it? Please spike it: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • muti
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • blogmarks
  • Fark
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • TailRank
  • SphereIt
Similar spikes:

Leave a comment

Please be polite and on topic. Your e-mail is needed to help verify you are not a spam-bot, and rarely if I need to contact you privately. It will never be published, abused or disclosed to anyone.

Please be aware that first-time commenters, as determined by your name and e-mail, are moderated. This unconscionable attack on your freedom of speech is regrettable, but since it helps combat the spam flood, it is non-negotiable. Please do not submit your comment twice. It will appear as soon as I see it in the moderation queue.