Wouldn’t you expect thieves to lie?
Most people just don’t believe the environmentalists. They think they’re being had. And they might just be right.
Of the more than 500 peer-reviewed scientific papers published on climate change in the last three years, less than half endorse, either explicitly or implicitly, the theory of anthropogenic global warming, a new survey has found. While few reject it out of hand, a plurality are neutral on the question.
Among the public, only four in ten Americans think there is evidence that humans cause climate change. and more than half of all Britons, says the BBC, believe politicians and scientists exaggerate global warming “to make money”.
And they’d be right. The very same BBC reports that a study by the UK Taxpayers’ Alliance finds that the government collects almost twice as much in green tax than is needed to pay for the “carbon footprint” those revenues are meant to “offset”. The change the government pocketed? More than £10 billion. Per household, that’s £400 pounds the greens and the bureaucrats are stealing.
Meanwhile, those “offsets” include such eco-friendly efforts as providing foot pumps to replace diesel-driven water pumps in the third world, so rural farmers can do long days of the sort of hard labour that a century ago was outlawed as too harsh for British prisoners.
You’d think that if British environuts are going to exploit third-world slave labour to salve your conscience, they’d at least figure out how to do it at a profit, so you can get a decent tax rebate too. Mind you, I guess someone has to pay for their fancy hybrids, solar panels, hemp fashions and organic artichokes.



Used to be the CIA spied on the KGB, and vice versa. In the post Cold War world, the black and white hats appear to have been passed to Microsoft and Google.
