BillyG whines the American Dream

The American Dream, in essence, says that the limits of a free individual’s ambition are not defined by class or social ambition, but by their own skill, ingenuity, hard work and determination. No matter what your economic condition, you are free to better it by applying your own wits and energy, and no royalty, nobility, government, clergy, community or neighbour can take this right away from you. It does not guarantee everyone instant wealth, nor does it guarantee everyone equal wealth, but it does guarantee that everyone has the same opportunities, and that nobody will have artificial ceilings imposed on what they can achieve in life.

So why is it that people like George Soros, and most recently, Bill Gates, feel obliged to spend their lives as poster-boys for the American Dream, proving the grand successes of liberty, free markets and capitalism, and then when they retire, the proceed to whine bitterly about how unfair their achievement is?

Read the rest of this entry »

Similar spikes:

Hold on to your gold

Darkness falls over Anglogold’s Tau Tona mine (Photo: Philip Mostert, click for larger image)The more this power crisis hits home, the harder I find it to see any silver lining to the huge dark cloud that covers South Africa right now. The golden lining, however, you just can’t miss.

I have always resisted pessimism, because I didn’t think that the socialist tendencies of the government were crisis-level serious. I thought they weren’t particularly good at generating growth, or creating jobs, or reducing poverty, but I didn’t think they were going to plunge the country into darkness and economic disaster.

Nevermind the money spent on gas lights, generators, solar panels, batteries, laptop replacements for PCs, fluorescent or LED replacements for light bulbs. Nevermind the money lost to small shops that don’t have generators, or supermarket that are required to turf out frozen foods if their refrigeration is off for more than three hours. Nevermind the the time lost in traffic chaos. Nevermind the hospitals that can’t keep diagnostic machines and surgeries powered. Nevermind the thousands of people with desktop computers that now must switch to laptops (if they can afford to do so) or be rendered useless for a quarter of their office hours.

Every time one sits and thinks about it, new and grave consequences of half a decade or more of regular blackouts come to mind, and all of this is a drain on the economy.

If you think the people who complain are just over-reacting pessimists, consider this:

South Africa’s gold mines, and mining companies in other sectors, were instructed on Thursday night by electricity utility Eskom to shut their mines, possibly for up to between two to six weeks.

A letter signed by Eskom CEO Jacob Maroga said that key industrial consumers (KPI) had to reduce their power loads to “minimum levels”. He added that Eskom could not guarantee power supply.

Same goes for platinum. One mine estimates expected daily losses of R60 million, or almost 10 000 ounces, every single day. Goodbye mining jobs. Goodbye precious metals exports. Goodbye to one of the main stays of the South African economy.

Already, the gold price is spiking. Already, the currency is sliding. Mining stocks are not the place to be right now. The only upside is for the gold bugs. Are they sitting pretty? South Africa recently lost its top position in global gold production to China. Soon, we’ll be fighting it out in the relegation zone.

Goodbye to our prized Global Competitiveness Index rating. Goodbye to boasting about the highest industrial output, producing the most power, and exporting the most minerals in Africa.

And the government’s response?

As you’ve heard from Minister [Alec] Erwin [of Public Enterprises, which is in charge of Eskom, the monopoly power utility], we are facing an emergency situation. However, we are mindful that this electricity emergency cannot be solved by government alone, but will have to be a collective effort by both ourselves and South Africans in general. Let’s all put our shoulders to the wheel to deal with the situation we find our selves in. […]

During our deliberations in Cabinet, it became obvious that the interventions that will provide us with immediate relief will be on the demand side management and energy efficiency. It goes without saying that we therefore, all need to ensure that energy conservation is a way of life.

So what you’re really saying, is that it cannot be solved by government at all. And yet, it is illegal for South Africans in general to do anything other than use less electricity.

Here’s the best bit:

South Africa’s current shortage of electricity, which the government has now conceded is an emergency, will not affect the 2010 Soccer World Cup, according to the government.

And why, pray tell, should we believe that?

Even if it results in an all-new all-singing all-dancing alternative energy industry (which is what the greens are cheering about), our ability to grow the economy, create jobs, and reduce poverty, already marginal thanks to high regulatory burdens and an interventionist government, will soon be a distant memory.

I am not invested in gold. Boy, was I stupid. I’m going to the pub. Even if the beer is warm.

PS: Photographer Philip Mostert wrote to say that Anglogold Ashanti, which offers the imaged used above for download in its media and marketing library, no longer owns the rights to it. Credit for this excellent photograph is, therefore, entirely due to him.

Similar spikes:

Flat-tax Forbes’s favourite

Rudolph GiulianiWith Fred Thompson having dropped out of the race, it’s time to weigh up the alternatives for the Republican nomination, from my perch on the southern end of Africa. What matters to me in an American president is foreign policy, of course, and economic policy. Bonus points for not being a bigot, a prig, a whinger or a preacher, but as I’ve written before, whether Americans permit gays to be married, guns to be carried or God to be harried, is really up to them.

Mitt Romney looks like a conservative Bill Clinton. He’s trying to be all things to all people, and that’s going to make him the lowest-common-denominator in office. I don’t trust the fellow. Mike Huckabee is a social conservative, not an economic conservative, and I’m looking for the exact opposite. Besides, I can’t take someone endorsed by Chuck Norris seriously.

John McCain is likeable enough, but neither his individual freedom record, nor his economic policy, appeal that much. He’s also lent his name to a heavy-handed and misguided campaign-finance law, and thinks government-enforced cap-and-trade schemes are just great. He’s great on foreign policy, perhaps, and might be able to appeal to the broad centre, but those are qualities that aren’t unique to him, and the rest of his positions are not what a classical liberal would want.

Which leaves Rudy Giuliani. He’s worked successfully with Democrats. He cleaned up New York, which used to be a poster city for crime, decadence and decay. He impressed on 9/11. He’s not going to surrender the free world to radicals and extremists and terrorists and fascists. And he doesn’t whine all the time about attacks from the vicious and vast left-wing wopist conspiracy.

But the clincher, for me, is set out in an excellent article on his tax plan by Steve Forbes, publisher of Forbes magazine and one-time candidate for president famous for his radical flat-tax proposals. Read it, and then tell me why Giuliani shouldn’t be the GOP nominee.

Similar spikes: